Part one of
this Black History Month blog focused on sweetgrass baskets, an African-based
art form still practiced by people in the South Carolina (and northern Georgia)
low country. This installment concerns
earthenware containers of history:
specifically, the distinctive pottery tradition of face jugs and the
remarkable productions of one of the few slave artists/craftspeople–Dave
Drake—whose name, works, and life experience have survived to claim their
rightful place in United States history.
Face
Jugs
Baskets are
fine containers for dry, perishable ingredients; in the pre-Civil-War American
South, pottery was the most common material from which to make containers for
liquids and long-term storage. The Edgefield
area south of Charleston, near the Savannah River, had ample supplies of clay
suitable for stoneware; it also had a large supply of second- or third-generation
‘in-country’ slave craftsmen. In the early
19th century, white entrepreneurs founded commercial potteries in
the area, ‘employing’ skilled slaves and developing craft techniques, like
attractive glazes and slip decorations, that enhanced product appeal to
customers who, earlier, had relied on more ad hoc plantation-made pottery.
Just about
all African cultures have made and still make pottery. Most is crafted by women, with the exception
of ritual or sacred vessels that must be fashioned by men. Antebellum South Carolina potteries used male
slaves as workers: is there any trace of African male-crafted pottery
traditions in pre-civil-war Edgefield pottery?
I think so,
at least obliquely. Face jugs began to
be produced in the decades before the Civil War, and their iconographical import
and possible religious use remain mysterious, although some have been found at
gravesites. Basically, face jugs are
smallish containers that feature rather grotesque faces; the main color is
usually dark, the mouth and teeth are highlighted, and the eyes are emphasized
with kaolin (white clay) and, sometimes, white shell, glass, or porcelain
inlay. Their small size suggests that
they were not utilitarian containers; their visually prominent mouths and,
particularly, eyes suggest that they have ties to Kongo minkisi (singular, nkisi) figures, sacra made by male
sculptors and male traditional healers.
In general, minkisi are sculptural repositories for
medicinal or retributive forces. The
best-known type today is the ‘nail fetish,’ a standing warlike figure into
which sharp metal objects are driven to activate the forces contained in the
object. Throughout the greater Kongo
cultural realm, however, most minkisi are
not metal-studded; they have medicinal/spiritual substances attached to or
contained within them, and they can be quite small. What they do have in common with their
nail-fetish brethren is white eyes—kaolin or shells or mirrored glass signifying
after-death spiritual power—and at least partially opened mouths signifying forceful truth-telling and, at times, a justice that can devour evil.
A Kongo nkisi nkondi (often referred to as a nail fetish) -- its function was
to pursue and/or punish evildoers; an older nkisi nkondi, denuded of its additive materials.
A Kongo nkisi with healing/protective materials added to or inserted in
the head, stomach, and back.
It makes sense to me,
therefore, that the original impetus for South Carolina face jugs is the Kongo nkisi tradition. A jug can be a repository for ‘magic’
substances as easily as a back cavity, an inserted horn or feathers, and
additive surface materials. The
increasingly whimsical appearance of South Carolina face jugs may be
attributable to the simple fact that they became popular, money-making
commodities and that white potters began to produce them.
A Fon (‘Slave Coast,’ present-day
Benin) bocio figure; note the chains signifying the enslavement these
deliberately ‘rough’ sculptures tried to prevent.
Another
historical message ante-bellum face jugs may send is the change in South Carolina
slave-importation patterns. 1807 marked a semi-halt to the slave trade proper; slave
ships still plied the waves, of course, but their embarkation points, routes, and
trans-shipment hubs became more complicated.
As opposed to earlier patterns, late 18th-century and early 19th-century
slave importation to South Carolina included many more shipments from the Slave
Coast, the Gold Coast, and the Bight of Biafra.
An Akan/Ashanti memorial head, used in
funerary rituals and placed on gravesites.
These diverse
populations could have contributed to the face jug tradition as well. Fon people (Slave Coast) were known for
bocio, often frightening anthropomorphic figures that warded off evil (including
being enslaved). Akan (Gold Coast)
people made terracotta heads to put on graves.
Eastern Nigerian peoples had masking and sacred sculptural traditions
that featured fearsome faces; Northern Nigerian peoples produced anthropomorphic
clay vessels.
An Ekoi/Ejagham head crest from the
Cross River area of Southeastern Nigeria (Bight of Benin); older exemplars are covered with (animal?) skin and perhaps substituted for actual enemy
heads.
A Chamba figurative vessel from
Northeast Nigeria (captured peoples from this area were transported to the
Bight of Benin, then sold).
Given the
many origins of South Carolina slaves by the mid-nineteenth century, it’s
probable that face jugs were a hybrid pottery form with initially a vaguely
apotropaic function. As their popularity
grew, a clever potter could ward off evil in a distinctly New World way – by
producing containers that sold well and thus prevented the potter himself from
being sold away from his community.
Dave
the Potter
The slave
craftspeople who made sweetgrass and pottery containers were almost always
anonymous. A notable exception is Dave Drake, known as ‘Dave the Potter,’ an Edgefield slave craftsman who not only
signed and dated most of his works but also incised short poems into his
pots. The large jar pictured in part above
includes this couplet: "I
made this jar, all of cross, if you don't repent, you will be lost."
Although some other Edgefield area slave potters signed their
works with distinctive marks, even initials, on the bottom of the pot, Dave
wrote his name and the fabrication date in large, bold letters on the shoulder
of the container. When he added a verse,
it appeared underneath the signature or elsewhere under the vessel's top lip.
Thus Dave claimed double authorship as potter and as poet.
A diorama
of ‘Pottersville,’ where Dave worked for
decades.
As a potter, Dave was remarkable: he produced some of the
largest stoneware vessels ever made in the United States. They are notable for their symmetrical
elegance, for the subtle variations of glazes, and for their durability—over
100 signed containers remain in collections throughout the south and elsewhere,
including the Smithsonian. Further, Dave
had only one leg, making it difficult to turn the potters wheel while throwing
the pot. One legend has it that Dave
threw himself across railroad tracks in order to lose a limb, thereby reducing his
value as a slave when his master threatened to sell him. Another oral tradition states that Dave was
paired with a slave who had lost both arms and who worked the wheel with his
strong legs while Dave created the vessel with his strong arms.
The best historical information about Dave the Potter is
embodied in his artworks themselves.
They testify to his strength – many are so large that they required four
handles to carry them when they were filled.
They testify to his aesthetic sensibility and his technical
prowess. And through his poetic
inscriptions, they also testify to his emotional and intellectual life, plus
providing a partial record of life events.
A pot
inscribed “Lm may 3rd
1862/Dave”; ‘Lm’ refers to Lewis Miles, who owned the potteryworks and may
have owned Dave for a time.
The inscriptions tell us that Dave was literate and was
instructed in Christianity. As they
often refer to his owners, and are dated, they provide a rough timeline of his
life in South Carolina (he stayed in the Edgefield area until his death, in the
1870s). They suggest pride in his craft
and knowledge of how his wares were to be used:
“A very large Jar = which has 4 handles =pack it full of fresh
meats — then light = candles,” the
candles referring to the melted wax that would seal the vessels. They
indicate that he had a love life and that family and friends had been sold away
from the community: "I wonder where is all my relations / Friendship to all—and every
nation."
The “sun,
moon, and, and stars” vessel that Dave made during the Civil War.
Evidently, Dave was not content to wonder about the itineraries
of fellow slaves. At least one
inscription appears to give directions to freedom, using the constellation Ursa
Major (‘the Big Bear,’ ‘the Big Dipper,’
‘the Drinking Gourd’) as a guide to the way North: "The
sun, moon and stars / in the west are plenty of bear.” Another makes a perhaps ironic reference to
Independence Day: “the fourth of July – is Surely come – / to blow the fife = and beat
the drum.” Since the 30-gallon jar
featuring this poem is dated July 4, 1859, Dave obviously was working rather
than enjoying the holiday.
Because he inscribed himself proudly in his own craft, Dave
Drake produced objects that contained and exhibited his own history, and via synecdoche,
the history of talented slaves who remain anonymous. Dave speaks for himself
and his compatriots. But it does not
diminish his self-made legacy, I think, by suggesting as a parallel
commemoration the words of Walt Whitman, a near-contemporary American
poet: “I am large. I contain multitudes.”
References
[Note: In 2010,
Laban Carrick Hill published a Caldecott-Medal-winning children’s book about
Dave the Potter, with lovely illustrations by Bryan Collier. Dave’s story, although especially inspiring
to African American children, fascinates children of all backgrounds.]
Baldwin,
Cinda K. "Edgefield Face Vessels: African-American Contributions to
American Folk Art." American Visions: The Magazine of Afro-American
Culture 5:4 (1990), pp.16-20.
Burrison,
John A. “South Carolina’s Edgefield
District: An Early International Crossroads of Clay.” American
Studies Journal 56 (2012). http://www.asjournal.org/56-2012/south-carolinas-edgefield-district-an-early-international-crossroads-of-clay/
Carney,
Judith A. Black Rice: The African Origins of Rice Cultivation in the Americas. Cambridge MA:
Harvard UP, 2002.
Cooksey,
Susan et al., editors. Kongo across the Waters. Gainesville FL: U of Florida P, 2013.
“Dave the
Potter—Pottersville, Edgefield County, South Carolina.” SCIWAY
(South Carolina’s Information Highway) 2016. http://www.sciway.net/afam/dave-slave-potter.html
Fields-Black,
Edda L. Deep Roots: Rice Farmers in West Africa and the African Diaspora.
Bloomington IN: Indiana UP, 2008.
“Grass Roots: African Origins of an American Art.” National Museum of African Art. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution, 2010. http://africa.si.edu/exhibits/grassroots/index.html
Hall,
Michael D. "Brother’s Keeper: Some Research on American Face
Vessels and Some Conjecture on the Cultural Witness of Folk Potters in the New
World." In Stereoscopic
Perspective: Reflections on American Fine Art and Folk Art. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1988.
Hill,
Laban Carrick. Dave the Potter: Artist, Poet, Slave. New York: Little, Brown, 2010.
“A History of
African American Face Jugs.” Chattanooga State, n.d.
http://river.chattanoogastate.edu/orientations/ex-learn-obj/Face_Jugs/Face_Jugs_print.html
Isensee,
Laura. “Calling Slaves ‘Workers’ is More
Than an Editing Error.” nprEd.
23 October 2015. http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/10/23/450826208/why-calling-slaves-workers-is-more-than-an-editing-error
Koverman,
Jill Beute. I Made This Jar: The Life and Works of the
Enslaved African-American Potter, Dave.
Columbia SC: U of South
Carolina--McKissick Museum, 1998.
Mack, Tom. “Dave the Potter.” U of South Carolina--Aiken. November 5, 1999.
http://polisci.usca.edu/aasc/davepotter.htm
Roberts,
Diana Lyn. The Centrality of Ceramics in African Cultures. Birmingham AL: Birmingham Museum of Art. (2013?)
Sumpter, Althea. “Geechee and Gullah Culture.” New Georgia Encyclopedia, 2006.
http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/arts-culture/geechee-and-gullah-culture
Todd,
Leonard. Carolina Clay: The Life and Legend of the Slave Potter, Dave. W.W. Norton, Fall 2008.
(See also Todd’s website: http://leonardtodd.com/)
Trull, Armando. “Smithsonian Unveils New ‘American Stories’
Exhibit.’ WAMU 88.5 (American University
Radio). 12 April 2012. http://wamu.org/news/morning_edition/12/04/12/smithsonian_unveils_new_american_stories_exhibit
Turner, Lorenzo Dow. Africanisms
in the Gullah Dialect (new edition).
Columbia SC: U of South Carolina
P, 2002.
Wood, Peter. Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial
South Carolina from 1670s through the Stono Rebellion. London: W.W. Norton and Co, 1974.
No comments:
Post a Comment