Perhaps so. Tomorrow
morning, Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney will hold a press conference in which he no
doubt will excoriate the nasty and childish tone of the Republican campaign for
president. We’ll have to tune in to find
out whether he will call out Donald Trump by name. (My guess:
yes.)
Because Romney has not sought the limelight since his 2012
defeat, his self-insertion into the current Republican demolition derby is
noteworthy. Maybe he’s just trying to
add a voice of reason to the prevailing caca-phony. Or maybe . . .
. . . he’s positioning himself for a last-ditch,
save-the-GOP move at this summer’s Republican Convention, which could happen
only if Stumpy, Lumpy, Frumpy, and Drumpfy somehow neutralize each other in the
upcoming primaries, leaving the Convention in must-watch free-for-all
mode.
Stumpy: needs Cuban heels to see over the podium
Lumpy: he wins the title of Mr. Blobfish
Do we really want a President who challenges both Rick
Santorum and Mr. Rogers for frumpiness?
Thank you, John Oliver. Enough said.
I never thought I would root for Mitt Romney. Then again, there has never been a campaign year
like this one. It would be great, and
huuuuge, if he were able to swipe the nomination at a brokered (“open”)
convention.
Why? (1) He’s
relatively sane. (2) His face does not
inspire instant revulsion, like Cruz or Trump.
(3) He may be a giant stiff, but he’s not a feckless boy orator (read:
Rubio). (4) He may be a bad campaigner,
but he’s not quite as tepid as Kasich; also, he has better name recognition
than Kasich.
And (5) – he would most probably lose to Hillary
Clinton. It would be a been-there,
done-that Presidential race, with Mitt Romney as the most recent btdt (losing)
candidate. Hillary might seem fresh in
comparison. He also would probably lose
to Bernie Sanders. Can we say 41%, or
49%, or whatever?
Obviously, I’m pulling for a Mitt Romney
coup-de-Republican-etat for a couple of reasons. First is that any major party Presidential
nominee has a fighting chance of winning. Romney was not my choice in 2012 and would not be my
choice in 2016, but if he were to win I wouldn’t stick my head in an oven or
move to some Eastern Canadian bumfucklandia. Second is that I’d like to see our two major political parties promote
relatively reasonable candidates, candidates who would not cause the rest of
the world to collapse in laughter, disgust, or terror.
What remains to be analyzed is what Romney actually says
tomorrow – and what interests (other than Romney’s own) are behind the press
conference. I suspect that some elements
of the ‘Republican Establishment’ are laying the groundwork for a party-saving Rafalca. Stay tuned.
You remembered Rafalca!!!!
ReplyDeleteOf course. Rafalca was one of the more entertaining characters in the 2012 race. Who doesn't like a dark horse?
Delete